Welcome! I’m Thomas…

Upgrading to SQL Server 2014: A Dozen Things to Check

Upgrading to SQL Server 2014: A Dozen Things to Check

Here we go again! It seems that it was only yesterday we were talking about all the things you want to look out for when upgrading to SQL Server 2012. Now, just two years since SQL Server 2012 was released, we have a shiny new version with SQL Server 2014. And that means, of course, people will be thinking about upgrading to SQL Server 2014. So I’ve put together a list of items that you will want to have handy when upgrading or migrating your databases from those dusty old versions to the brand new SQL Server 2014 engine.

I’ve witnessed many novice administrators make the common mistake of believing that the upgrade process for a database server is as easy as pressing a few buttons. While you can certainly click “Next, Next, Finish” and consider your task to be complete the truth is that the upgrade process is often considerably more complex. A proper upgrade process involves detailed research, planning, and execution.

Failing to prepare a proper upgrade process for your database server is likely to result in your end users seeing diminished performance after the upgrade is complete. Since your goal is to increase performance and stability as a result of the upgrade you can understand that your users are likely to be upset if things were to get worse!

Since it can be a daunting task to put together everything you need in a pre-upgrade checklist, I’ve compiled this list of items that you need to include in any checklist you put together for migrating your database server to SQL Server 2014. Including these items into your checklist is likely to help you avoid 98% of any potential upgrade issues.

Please note that these steps are specific for an upgrade to the database schema and data. They do not include anything regarding the upgrading or testing of an application that is going to be accessing the upgraded database. You will want to remember to test your application and not just assume it will work perfectly even after the database has been upgraded. I would also advise that you perform these steps in a non-production environment first because I often find that common sense isn’t so common after all.

Also please note that this list is meant to serve as a guide for you to use when doing either an in-place upgrade or when migrating from a previous version. However, I always recommend doing a migration whenever possible as opposed to the in-place upgrades. Migrations (typically done by restoring a database backup from the current instance) just make me feel more comfortable should I need to troubleshoot issues later. I like knowing I started with a clean slate, but that’s just how I roll. You should do what works best for you.

1. Using the SQL 2014 Upgrade Advisor

The SQL Server 2014 Upgrade Advisor (UA) is just that: an advisor. Much like a consultant, it doesn’t fix everything that is wrong, it merely advises you on what actions you should take when upgrading to SQL 2014. The actions the UA recommends will come in two forms: those actions to be done prior to a migration, and those actions to be completed post-migration. The UA is really good at finding what I call the “stub-your-big-toe” things that need fixing prior to a migration. But it is not foolproof, it will not identify every last detail. You will need to play the role of an actual DBA when migrating to a new version. Many of the items below will help you to do just that.

2. Reviewing the “breaking changes” section in the Books Online

Did you know that Microsoft publishes a list of breaking changes for each version of SQL Server? Well, you do now. You should review them to the point that they are familiar to you. You don’t have to memorize them all, just be familiar with them so that if something odd happens you can think to yourself “…hey, is this odd behavior listed in the breaking changes section of the Books Online (BOL)”? I would like to believe that the UA will alert you to many of these breaking changes but the truth is the UA is not as dynamic as the BOL. That means the BOL may have an entry or two that doesn’t make it into the UA checklist, and that is why you should review this section.

Currently (as of this post in June of 2014) the link above lists the breaking changes for SQL Server 2014 simple as “no new issues”. I believe this is simply because this BOL entry has yet to be updated, so check back on this page often and I am certain you will find content listed.

3. Reviewing the “behavioral changes” section in the Books Online

Similar to the breaking changes, the behavioral changes are changes that could still affect you in an adverse way. They are definitely worth reviewing, and they are also things that the UA is likely to never report back to you about because they aren’t things that *will* break, but merely things that *could* break. Also worth noting is that the BOL appears to have two entries for behavioral changes, one for SQL Server features, and one specific for the database engine.  I’d advise you keep your eye on both going forward.


One of your post-migration or upgrade tasks should be to run the following statement:


This statement will check your data for values that are no longer valid for the column datatype. For databases created prior to SQL 2005 (and you *know* they are still out there), this step is rather important to take. For databases created in SQL 2005 and later, the DATA_PURITY check is supposed to be done automatically with a regular CHECKDB.

But what about a database that was created in SQL 2000, migrated (poorly) to a SQL 2008 instance, and left in the SQL 2000 (80) backward compatibility mode? What about that little feller? Do you want to assume that the DATA_PURITY check has been getting done? Here’s a thought: just go run it yourself anyway. That way you know it is getting done.

5. Executing DBCC UPDATEUSAGE command

While not as critical as the DATA_PURITY command noted previously, this one still has a place in any migration or upgrade process:


This command will help fix any page count inaccuracies that are resulting in the sp_spaceused stored procedure returning wrong results. For SQL Server 2012, this check was recommended for databases created prior to SQL Server 2005. However, in SQL Server 2014, the BOL entry link lists this command as being applicable for databases created in SQL Server 2008 and later. That seems odd to me, since this command is valid for SQL Server 2005. I’m not certain why the SQL Server 2014 documentation states this as a command for SQL Server 2008 and later. I’d recommend you run this for SQL Server 2005 databases being migrated to SQL Server 2014 anyway. [If I can get an answer from someone at Microsoft regarding this documentation issue I will update this post accordingly. In fact, I see this message for a handful of SQL Server 2014 entries, and I think that it’s usage is slightly misleading.]

6. Updating statistics

This one is not to be skipped and is simply a MUST for any migration or upgrade checklist:

USE db_name;
EXEC sp_updatestats;

This command will update the statistics for all the tables in your database. It issues the UPDATE STATISTICS command, which warrants mentioning because you *may* want to use that command with the FULLSCAN option. I’m the type of person that would rather be safe than sorry and therefore would end up running something like this:

USE db_name;
EXEC sp_MSforeachtable @command1='UPDATE STATISTICS ? WITH FULLSCAN';

Bottom line: don’t forget to update the statistics after an upgrade. Failure to do so could result in your queries running slowly as you start your testing and may end up wasting your time while you try to troubleshoot the possible bottlenecks. With SQL Server 2014 there is also a new Cardinality Estimator (CE), and I’ll talk more about this later, but you are going to want to make certain your statistics are as accurate as possible before you begin any testing. So, take care of the stats now, and you don’t have to worry about it later.

7. Refreshing your views using sp_refreshview

Believe it or not, every now and then someone will build a view that spans into another database on the same instance. And, in what may be a complete surprise to many, sometimes these views will go across a linked server as well. The point here is that your view may not be of data that is contained in just the database on that single instance. In what could be the most dramatic twist of all, sometimes these views are created using a SELECT * syntax.

I know, I know…what are the odds that you could have such code in your shop? But it happens. And when you have bad code on top of views that go to other databases (or views of views of views of whatever else some sadistic person built) you are going to want to use sp_refreshview to refresh those views.

So, if you are migrating a database in your environment to a new server then it would be a good idea to refresh your views using sp_refreshview. Most of the time it won’t do anything for you, just like a burger topped with veggie bacon. But there is that one chance where it will dramatically improve performance and your customer will be happy as a result. Using sp_refreshview is a lot like like flossing: it doesn’t take much effort, and the end result is usually worth it.

8. Taking backups

You’re a DBA. Backups should be in your DNA. You should have taken one prior to the start of any upgrade or migration, and you had better take one right before you turn that database over to your end users. Also, you should save any output from the items listed here, as it could prove helpful should something go awry later. (bonus item – make sure your backups are good!)

9. Upgrading your hardware

Microsoft lists the minimum requirements for installing SQL Server 2014 on this page. However, those are the *minimums* there. Chances are if your servers don’t already meet those requirements then you aren’t looking to upgrade anytime soon anyway. But if you are upgrading, then it might be time to upgrade your hardware as well. Heck, you may even consider going virtual (if you aren’t already), which will still require you to examine your hardware requirements.

But here’s the real reason you will want to upgrade your hardware: new features. Let’s say that you are thinking of upgrading to SQL Server 2014 in order to take advantage of In-Memory OLTP Hekaton. I can’t find any MSDN article that states if there are minimum hardware requirements for Hekaton, but I did find this blog post from the SQL Server team that suggests some guidelines. Considering there is a lot of shiny new things in SQL Server 2014, chances are you’ll need to do some extra legwork here to scope out what hardware you’ll need in order to leverage many of these new features.

10. Knowing the right upgrade path

For those folks running SQL Server 2000 instances (yes we KNOW you still exist) you are not able to upgrade directly to SQL Server 2014 without first upgrading to an intermediary version. You have two options to choose from when going from pre-SQL Server 2005 versions. The first option is to do an upgrade in place to SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, or SQL Server 2008 R2. The second option is to do a backup (or even detach) your database and restore/attach to an instance running SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, or SQL Server 2008 R2. At that point you will be able to complete the upgrade to SQL 2014.

And like I said at the beginning, I prefer to do migrations rather than upgrades in place. It’s just a preference. For something like a SQL Server 2000 database, I’d need to do a backup, restore it to an intermediary version (like SQL Server 2008 R2), then do another backup and restore that to SQL Server 2014. At that point you should run through this checklist before turning it over for testing.

11. Check your compatibility levels

If you have been going through SQL Server upgrades for the past ten years then you are likely to have noticed that the compatibility level does not get set to the newest version after the migration is complete. You need to manually set the compatibility level yourself. With SQL Server 2014 this becomes more important than in previous versions due to the new Cardinality Estimator (CE).

I delivered a session at TechEd this year on the new CE, Jimmy May has a short summary blog post regarding the new CE, and there’s also what I consider to be the “Gold Standard” on the new CE in a great whitepaper from Joe Sack that details the good, the bad, and the ugly with the new CE.

The TL;DR version of the whitepaper is this: you’ll want to take advantage of the new CE except for the times when you won’t. Part of this is knowing which compatibility level you are using. I’d recommend you update every database on the SQL Server 2014 instance to compatibility mode 120 and test, test, test. [This assumes that you have baselined performance for your critical queries prior to the migration, so that you can verify if the new CE is working for or against you.]

12. Read the release notes

Because you’re a geek, that’s why. Take a few minutes and read the release notes. No, they aren’t as funny as the release notes for apps on your phone, but they can be useful for you to review anyway. It’s good to have as complete a picture as possible for the new version should something not work as expected, and there are details in the release notes you may not find elsewhere.


Upgrades are a necessary part of any development lifecycle. The chances of having a successful upgrade increases along with the amount of planning and preparation you invest in building a proper upgrade process. If you are planning to upgrade to SQL 2014 you can use this post as a guide to help put together your checklist.

If you haven’t started building up your SQL 2014 migration or upgrade checklist yet, now is the time, and get these items included. They will save you pain, I promise.

10 Pingbacks/Trackbacks

  • Pingback: Upgrading to SQL Server 2014: A Dozen Things to Check - SQL Server - SQL Server - Toad World()

  • Pingback: (SFTW) SQL Server Links 06/06/14 - John Sansom()

  • Pingback: Newsletter: June 7, 2014 | Notes from MWhite()

  • ronivered

    Thanks, interesting read. We’re upgrading this year to 2014 from 2008, so every checklist is welcomed.

    • ThomasLaRock

      You are most welcome, hope the information is useful for you!

  • Sergio Pacheco

    What is your feeling regarding using Distributed Replay as part of the upgrade testing process?

    • ThomasLaRock


      I hadn’t thought about using that, nor do I recall seeing it mentioned by others doing upgrades or migrations. But now that you mention it, I think it could be a fine tool to use as well.



  • Pingback: The Real SQL Server 2014 Power Feature (It May Not Be Hekaton) - SQLRockstar - Thomas LaRock()

  • Pingback: Upgrading to SQL Server 2014 – Campus Days talk (slides in Danish) – David Peter Hansen()

  • Richard

    just come across this article as we’re upgrading from 2000 to 2014. You mention one upgrade path is to upgrade to 2012 (directly from 2000) then to 2014 from there but the docs say we can only go as high as 2008R2 before making the jump to 2014??

    • ThomasLaRock


      Hmmm…it does seem that you need to do an extra step before SQL 2012. I wonder if the MSDN article was updated after my blog post? Not sure. But my earlier post on SQL 2012 says you need the extra step, so it is more likely that I made a mistake here. I will edit the post accordingly now.

      Thanks for the comment, and sorry for the error.

  • Pingback: 101 Things I Wish You Knew About SQL Server - Thomas LaRock()

  • Useful Information. Thank You

  • alzdba

    Great article, however TIP no 7 is absolutely DANGEROUS !
    I’ve been bit by it a couple of weeks ago and will have a workaround published in a couple of weeks at mssqltips.
    Most important ref:

    • ThomasLaRock

      Thanks for the comment and the link. However, the issue you have pointed out is NOT the same as what is in tip number 7 on this post. I am only suggesting the use of sp_refreshview by itself. I am not suggesting a renaming of a view inside of SSMS combined with the use of sp_refreshview.

      I am curious to know, however, if the use of SCHEMABINDING would prevent the issue you have mentioned.

      • alzdba

        The danger lies in the fact these renamed views carry the ddl of their original views ! Hence, if you run sp_refreshview for such renamed view, it will actually refresh its original view, using the original DDL.
        AFAIK schemabinding only prevents the referenced objects to get altered, so that will not play any role in this process(unless that view is being referenced by another schemabound view)

        • ThomasLaRock

          So, I just tried this on an instance of SQL2014 and I was not able to recreate the issue. Selecting from the views returns different data. I did not, however, that intellisense indicates that the renamed view is not a valid object, so I can see something is weird here, no question. I’m looking forward to your article!

  • Robert Cotran

    Thanks for the list, I used some of it in an upgrade this week from 2008 to 2014. I was wondering. Why is it bad to have a view which spans two databases? How else would you bring data from two databases into one place without having the application layer take care of it?

    • ThomasLaRock

      It’s not that such a view is bad necessarily, but rather that’s why I suggest you use sp_refreshview in order to make sure you have the latest metadata available for the optimizer to use.

  • Agree with the recommendations here; I would also recommend DBCC CHECKDB as a pre-upgrade tasks before they do upgrade. Not just post-upgrade. Ideally, they should have regular database consistency checks, however I have seen number of upgrades fail; because do not have this. Therefore, post upgrade, when they find corruption. It becomes upgrade’s fault never mind poor database management practices :). Goes in line with make sure you have good backups (with CHECKSUM) — recommendation #8.

    • ThomasLaRock

      Thanks! I can add that in to the next revision. Much appreciated!

  • Pingback: How to Migrate from SQL 2005 to 2014 » The Data Queen()

  • Pingback: SQL 2014 upgrade experience | David Wimbush()

  • Pingback: HammerDB and The New SQL Server 2014 Cardinality Estimator | SQL JGood()

  • Pingback: SQL Server Trace Flags - Thomas LaRock()

  • Kishore SSTL

    I have migrated the database from SQL Server 2005 to 2012 with SP3. As per your suggestions, performed all tasks. But queries running very slow compared to SQL Server 2005. New server is Win 2012 R2, SQL Server 2012 with SP3, RAM 64GB, etc. Old server is Windows 2003 R2 with 16 GB RAM, SQL Server 2005 with SP4.
    I was spend lot of time, but no luck. So can you please provide your suggestions.

    • ThomasLaRock

      I suggest you use a tool like SolarWinds DPA to examine queries and wait events. At that point you should have enough information to make whatever adjustments are necessary.

  • Drew Dowling

    I just want to say thank you. We just had a successful in place upgrade and this guide really helped make it go smoothly.

  • Sanjeev Saini


    I am planing to Migrate(side by side upgrade) our 2005 server’s to 2014, I need to know whether we need to move our servers to SQL 2005 SP4 before we take backup and restore it on SQL 2014 or any SP version is fine ?


    • ThomasLaRock
      • Sanjeev Saini

        If you can advice whether we should move to 2014 or 2016, as cost is not the constraint here. what else we should keep in mind before we decide to upgrade our Servers to 2016.


        • ThomasLaRock

          I cannot think of any reason to not upgrade to the latest version possible.