Comments on: Yes, SQL Server Standard Edition is NUMA Aware https://thomaslarock.com/2019/01/yes-sql-server-standard-edition-is-numa-aware/ Thomas LaRock is an author, speaker, data expert, and SQLRockstar. He helps people connect, learn, and share. Along the way he solves data problems, too. Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:39:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: JB https://thomaslarock.com/2019/01/yes-sql-server-standard-edition-is-numa-aware/#comment-88268 Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:39:02 +0000 https://thomaslarock.com/?p=19435#comment-88268 We are in FEBR 2022 and they have not changed a thing in the documentation where the compare all the versions. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/editions-and-components-of-sql-server-version-15?view=sql-server-ver15

]]> By: Jonathan M Kehayias https://thomaslarock.com/2019/01/yes-sql-server-standard-edition-is-numa-aware/#comment-55640 Mon, 03 Jun 2019 22:42:27 +0000 https://thomaslarock.com/?p=19435#comment-55640 Since this just came up on Twitter again…

The feature is NUMA Aware Large Page Memory and Buffer Allocation, the extra “and” is the documentation mistake there, because this IS an Enterprise Feature with TF 834 and LPIM on 16GB RAM or more. You can’t do that in Standard Edition.

If you look at the BOL topic for SQL Server 2014, you can see the feature name as NUMA Aware Large Page Memory and Buffer Allocation, so somewhere after 2014 someone messed up the name of the feature, adding the additional “and” to the name making it incorrect:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/getting-started/features-supported-by-the-editions-of-sql-server-2014?view=sql-server-2014

]]>