<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Error Messages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomaslarock.com/2009/06/microoft-error-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/06/microoft-error-messages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Segarra</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/06/microoft-error-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Segarra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaslarock.com/?p=2284#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Recently I&#039;ve come to deal with (again) the dreaded &quot;Cannot generate SSPI context&quot; message from client. Nothing changed and the SQL instance (2000 SP4+HF) was running under a domain account that is made for running as a service. But after a recent restart of service I got the error message. Only fix I found was to change the service to run as Local System. I&#039;m still investigating as to why that account had issues. What made it stranger is that the account was a local admin on that box (I know, I know not best practice but this one was legacy and getting upgraded soon anyhow).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;ve come to deal with (again) the dreaded &#8220;Cannot generate SSPI context&#8221; message from client. Nothing changed and the SQL instance (2000 SP4+HF) was running under a domain account that is made for running as a service. But after a recent restart of service I got the error message. Only fix I found was to change the service to run as Local System. I&#8217;m still investigating as to why that account had issues. What made it stranger is that the account was a local admin on that box (I know, I know not best practice but this one was legacy and getting upgraded soon anyhow).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Woody</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/06/microoft-error-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaslarock.com/?p=2284#comment-766</guid>
		<description>And of course you can always peruse various forums. A lot of users post the full error messages they are getting in certain circumstances there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course you can always peruse various forums. A lot of users post the full error messages they are getting in certain circumstances there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Woody</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/06/microoft-error-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaslarock.com/?p=2284#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m assuming you&#039;ve already opened sysmessages....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m assuming you&#8217;ve already opened sysmessages&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas LaRock</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/06/microoft-error-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas LaRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaslarock.com/?p=2284#comment-764</guid>
		<description>thanks for the info Buck. I know the system is quite complex and it would be difficult to have perfect errors messages for every possible scenario. the point of my question is to gather some information on error messages so that I can make an effort to perform some RCA testing. i would love to take some examples from around here but everything seems to be working perfectly as of late...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the info Buck. I know the system is quite complex and it would be difficult to have perfect errors messages for every possible scenario. the point of my question is to gather some information on error messages so that I can make an effort to perform some RCA testing. i would love to take some examples from around here but everything seems to be working perfectly as of late&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Woody</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/06/microoft-error-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaslarock.com/?p=2284#comment-763</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve hit an interesting topic. In a complex system, you&#039;re never really sure which component delivers an error message - it could be a discrete component (such as the SQL Server Engine Locking mechanism) or the system just above it (the Query Processor) or even an interaction between the two. For that matter, most errors you never see - the SQL Server base code intercepts them and deals with it. After all, it&#039;s not that we want you just to know what went wrong - if we know that, we can often just fix it for you. It&#039;s that complex interaction that makes the messages difficult to interpret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve hit an interesting topic. In a complex system, you&#8217;re never really sure which component delivers an error message &#8211; it could be a discrete component (such as the SQL Server Engine Locking mechanism) or the system just above it (the Query Processor) or even an interaction between the two. For that matter, most errors you never see &#8211; the SQL Server base code intercepts them and deals with it. After all, it&#8217;s not that we want you just to know what went wrong &#8211; if we know that, we can often just fix it for you. It&#8217;s that complex interaction that makes the messages difficult to interpret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 502/504 objects using disk: basic

Served from: thomaslarock.com @ 2012-05-22 11:58:55 -->
