<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When To Use Auto Shrink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomaslarock.com/2009/03/when-to-use-auto-shrink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/03/when-to-use-auto-shrink/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Shrinking Your Database Files. Seriously. Now. &#124; Brent Ozar - SQL Server DBA</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/03/when-to-use-auto-shrink/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Shrinking Your Database Files. Seriously. Now. &#124; Brent Ozar - SQL Server DBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlbatman.com/?p=1295#comment-423</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom LaRock &#8211; &#8220;When to Use AutoShrink&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom LaRock &#8211; &#8220;When to Use AutoShrink&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brant Wedel</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/03/when-to-use-auto-shrink/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant Wedel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlbatman.com/?p=1295#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Lol, its an option for databases storing historical data sets that other people have access to that might do a query causing a large file size jump, and maybe you have hundreds of these databases on a single server because your cheap and if they all were allowed to expand the server wouldn&#039;t hold them all in thier &#039;unshrunk&#039; state =P.  SCADA databases are a good example of where AutoShrink might be useful im currently looking into it as we would like to continue using SqlExpress which has a 4 gig limit.  And we will be doing monthly queries on the data, so performance is not a requirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, its an option for databases storing historical data sets that other people have access to that might do a query causing a large file size jump, and maybe you have hundreds of these databases on a single server because your cheap and if they all were allowed to expand the server wouldn&#8217;t hold them all in thier &#8216;unshrunk&#8217; state =P.  SCADA databases are a good example of where AutoShrink might be useful im currently looking into it as we would like to continue using SqlExpress which has a 4 gig limit.  And we will be doing monthly queries on the data, so performance is not a requirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQLBatman</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/03/when-to-use-auto-shrink/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>SQLBatman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlbatman.com/?p=1295#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Wow, Paul. If they would not listen to you, what hope is there for the rest of us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Paul. If they would not listen to you, what hope is there for the rest of us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Randal</title>
		<link>http://thomaslarock.com/2009/03/when-to-use-auto-shrink/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlbatman.com/?p=1295#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Back when I was responsible for the whole Core Storage Engine at MS, I tried to have auto-shrink removed from the product - and failed. Backwards-compatibility trumped the ability for DBAs to shoot themselves in the foot. At least I managed to remove the &#039;Repair minor corruptions&#039; options from the maintenance plan wizard... Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when I was responsible for the whole Core Storage Engine at MS, I tried to have auto-shrink removed from the product &#8211; and failed. Backwards-compatibility trumped the ability for DBAs to shoot themselves in the foot. At least I managed to remove the &#8216;Repair minor corruptions&#8217; options from the maintenance plan wizard&#8230; Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 8/14 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 464/467 objects using disk: basic

Served from: thomaslarock.com @ 2012-02-08 16:35:38 -->
